Friday, April 08, 2005

A Good Day, Finally

Well, I was going to post part three is my oh-so-cheery series, "I Can't Fucking Take It Anymore," but it's Friday, the sun is shining, it's warm, the girls are all out in short skirts, and I've found a new blogging platform that makes me so very happy to be blogging again.

Check out:

Such excellent software, so many more features so better implemented than blogger: trackbacks, permanent pages, a better composition UI, categories, the whole shebang. Anyway, this site may be switching to there permanently in the near future. Until then, enjoy the very cheery Part II to the aforementioned series at the (potentially) new blog.

Monday, April 04, 2005

ICan'tFuckingTakeItAnymore Part I: Debt Slavery

What the Bankruptcy Bill Could Do to You from the Black Commentator.
The U.S. Senate has passed a dream bill for credit card and financial service companies that, if passed by the House, will land millions of American families in debt slavery. Rather than being able to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and make a difficult new start, families and individuals will be placed on long-term payment plans to credit card companies, companies that will take their houses, their cars, their child-support payments, and their paychecks.
The above opens a devastating expose and critique of the pending "Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005." This Republican sponsored bill passed the Senate on March 10th, 2005 with a considerable amount of support from Democrats. What, exactly, does this bill change that makes it so important?

First, here's how personal bankruptcy filings are supposed to work today:
After filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, you're required to liquidate some assets and pay off what you can. But you are then able to write off the rest of your debt and start over, albeit with a credit record that will make it harder to borrow and sometimes harder to find work. Under the current system, if a judge finds that you have significant assets or income, you can be denied Chapter 7 and be required to enter into Chapter 13 bankruptcy, in which you pay off your debt over a number of years. This current "means test" is conducted by a judge who is able to look at actual income and expenses, as well as to distinguish between someone whose child has diabetes and someone who's been going on reckless shopping sprees.
Now, here's what Congress proposes to change:

The bill that is coming up for a vote in the House would create a new means test that would forbid making any such distinctions. It would even forbid comparing what someone actually earns with what they actually have to pay for rent and basic expenses. A court would be forced to use standard government figures for expenses, regardless of what you're actually having to pay. It would base your income on your last six months of income, even if you just got laid off. If your income is below the median, it would spare you the means test but require that you purchase credit counseling, even if you have no money to pay for it and it isn't offered anywhere near your home. It would also require significant new legal expenses and paperwork
OK, so that's kind of harsh, but if folks are abusing the system, perhaps we should crack down, right? Well, that might be true (doubtful) if folks were actually abusing the system.
As with Social Security, there's a grain of truth that can be found if you dig for it.... Estimates of cases of abuse of bankruptcy law range from 3 to 10 percent. The non-partisan American Bankruptcy Institute estimates that at most 3 percent of filers – and almost certainly less – are able to discharge debts they could actually pay.
I don't know if any of you know anyone who's had to declare bankruptcy, but imagine: you can't get a credit card (or can only get one at close to 30% interest), so you can't buy anything off the Internet (e.g., prescription drugs you can't afford otherwise); you can't get a job handling money (credit risk=theft risk for many corporate employers), so many of the low paying jobs forming your pool of likely employers is closed to you; it's very difficult to find a good place to rent (buying is out of the question and most landlords run credit checks and reject bankruptcies), so you'll often have to settle for sub-standard digs.

This is not the case with everyone, and I've known people who have declared bankruptcy and then gone on to rebuild their lives: which is exactly the point of the system. Yet our leaders in Congress seem to think that the rebuilding part should start, basically, from the street. No keeping the car so you can drive to a job anymore. Just as our penal system has moved towards some Old Testament punishment model, our Congress wants to punish rather than help folks in dire straights.

But surely, you say, credit card companies, et al., wouldn't ask for such draconian measures unless they were losing money hand over fist, unless such "abuses" caused them great financial hardship they must of necessity pass on to their "good" customers?
Credit card companies, like most lenders, charge interest rates based on the risk they see of each borrower failing to pay back the loan. Some people pay 9 percent on their credit card and others pay 29 percent. The higher rate is supposed to cover the losses the lender will suffer when some of the riskier borrowers default. This system has been bringing in massive record profits for the credit card companies: $30 billion last year.
Not only are credit companies profitable, they've already collected money against any risk they incur:
"Here's what's so strange," writes Corinne Cooper, a retired law professor in Arizona, "The credit card companies collect this risk premium, year in and year out. But when the risk actually happens and the borrower cannot pay, the lenders want the Federal government to intervene to force the debtor to pay, by passing a law prohibiting them from filing bankruptcy and discharging the debts. It's as if a life insurance company took premium payments for years and then asked the government to pass a law prohibiting death! Bankruptcy is credit death, and if this bill passes, the courts will be clogged with credit 'zombies' – consumers who can never pay back their debt, and never get rid of it.
Fine, you say, this sucks but it doesn't really have anything to do with me. I don't expect to go bankrupt anytime soon. NO ONE expects to go bankrupt, and yet few understand how easy it is, how quickly things can change:
Half of all U.S. bankruptcies are caused by soaring medical bills and most people sent into debt by illness are middle-class workers with health insurance....
The above is from a recently completed Harvard study. The study relied extensively on data from South Carolina (among other places) and in a Reuters interview on the study, local bankruptcy expert George Cauthen said that, "fewer than 1 percent of all bankruptcy filings were due to credit card debt." He went on to add that credit card debt leading directly to bankruptcy"truly is a myth."

Yeah. There's your republican family values for you. Manufacture a "crisis" (gee, where have we heard that before) and then fuck middle and working class families squarely in the ass, 'cause can bet that aforementioned ass that the monied classes have it all squirled away in untouchable "asset protection trusts."

Kind of hard to keep the old family together if their all out on the god damned street, eh? I suppose it's merely a matter of time before we bring back real debtors prisons. Prison, you say, well, at least it's better than the street. I'll take a look at that next.

Friday, April 01, 2005


_w.a[wk]lk divine_


This is a, um, poem? Blog post? A bit of some arcane computer script mixed in with random words? As Stongbad might put it, "What, did the quadratic formula explode?" It's mezangelle, written by the artist currently known as ][mez][. "Google mezangelle" for some insight into her work. I especially like the following, not least of which because I can't tell if it's for real or not (although it seems legit):
"An honorary mention goes to "Re (ad.htm" by the Australian artist mez, This entry created a lot of discussion in the jury, and quite dissimilar individual rankings and opinions. "Re(ad.htm" consists of a selection of writings or, to use the artist's terminology, "wurks" that had been posted to several net cultural and arts-related mailing lists. They are highly condensed pieces written in "mezangelle", an invented hybrid language which mixes syntactical snippets of programming languages, network protocols and markup code with the English language. The resulting texts can be read in multiple, often contradictory ways due to their elaborate use of ambiguity and compound ('portmanteau') words noted in rectangular brackets, thus resembling regular and Boolean expressions in commandline programs and programming languages.

In contrast to a merely ornamental code chic, this hybrid language is used to expose and deconstruct the epistemological politics engendered into seemingly "neutral", technical codes. It is poetically dense, involving and difficult, but also humorous. Of course, it is not technically executable code, although the bracketed expressions expand into multiple combinatory output sequences. But above all the mezangelle targets fictitious, fantastic compilers, creating a dream-like imagination of metonymic contiguity between human bodies and machines. Sure, this topic has been spelled out in popular culture and media theory multiple times, but mez succeeds to free it from all cyber-kitsch by tackling it from within, in structure."

- jury for the read_me 1.2 software art award.

(Thanks Mean Old Man)

The review in itself is pretty interesting. There's lots more reviews like these here. But I'd suggest you just get to ][mez]['s site and dig it. I kind of feel like I'm in 9th grade again and discovering e.e. cummings or William Carlos Williams for the first time.